Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Kurt Harriman <harriman@acm.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-01-18T21:20:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On sön, 2009-12-06 at 02:21 -0800, Kurt Harriman wrote:
> > Which ones does it actually offer any benefit for?
> 
> MSVC is one.

I seem to recall that somewhere else it was said that MSVC produces
warnings on unused static inline functions.  Am I mistaken?

Also, if this is mainly for the benefit of MSVC, we don't really need a
configure check, do we?