Re: plpython3

On ons, 2010-01-13 at 13:33 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> The only thing I am currently looking for is an objective review of the
> patch based on the benefits it provides.

Right, but I was opining that such a vague feature listing is not
adequate for that.

> I can tell you that if the Pye
> patch provides stack trace capability and the current PL does not. That
> right there is enough for me to push a +1 for review and possible
> inclusion.

That is the case.

> If you feel what James is saying is actually trite and more buzzword 
> compliant I welcome the opportunity to see a comparative of the current 
> status of PL/Python versus the Pye patch from you. If nothing else it is
> a learning opportunity for all involved.

There was extensive discussion about some of the design decisions
upthread, so any reviewer should review those.  It may end up being a
agree-to-disagree situation.