Re: why partition pruning doesn't work?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>,
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>,
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>,
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-06-09T21:00:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote: > One thing I'm wondering about is why in the world are PartitionPruneInfo > and its subsidiary struct types declared in primnodes.h? Oh, and while I'm bitching: it seems like there is hardly any part of the partitioning code in which the comments aren't desperately in need of a copy-editing pass. They are just chock-full of misspellings, grammar that is faulty enough to make the meaning unclear, and/or errors of fact. An example of the latter is the repeated claims that the basic partitioning functions belong to the planner. Maybe that was true at some stage of development; but AFAICS the logic in question now lives in src/backend/partitioning/, which I would not think is part of the planner. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Fix up run-time partition pruning's use of relcache's partition data.
- e23bae82cf3d 11.0 landed
-
Fix access to just-closed relcache entry.
- bdc643e5e46f 11.0 landed
- b10edaf4bb44 10.5 landed
-
Improve ExecFindInitialMatchingSubPlans's subplan renumbering logic.
- 69025c5a07a1 11.0 landed
-
Improve commentary about run-time partition pruning data structures.
- 4e2323640333 11.0 landed
-
Fix run-time partition pruning code to handle NULL values properly.
- be3d90026a3c 11.0 landed
-
Assorted cosmetic cleanup of run-time-partition-pruning code.
- 321f648a312b 11.0 landed
-
Relocate partition pruning structs to a saner place.
- 939449de0e57 11.0 landed
-
Improve run-time partition pruning to handle any stable expression.
- 73b7f48f78d2 11.0 landed
-
Support partition pruning at execution time
- 499be013de65 11.0 cited