Re: uintptr_t for Datum
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-01-01T18:58:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On tor, 2009-12-31 at 13:44 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > >> BTW, it looks like the patch is showing a manual change to > > >> pg_config.h.in. Don't do that. Run autoheader. > > > > > I wasn't aware autoheader existed. Is that new or has it alwasy been > > > part of autoconf? > > > > It's always been there, or at least for many years. pg_config.h.in > > really ought to be thought of the same as configure: you don't edit > > it, you just generate it. > > Well, that's pretty confusing considering it has a .in suffix, just like > configure.in, which we do edit, but I get your point. I realize it's easy to miss, but the first line of pg_config.h.in tells that it is generated.