Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby

On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 16:07 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> - When replaying b-tree deletions, we currently wait out/cancel all
> running (read-only) transactions. We take the ultra-conservative
> stance because we don't know how recent the tuples being deleted are.
> If we could store a better estimate for latestRemovedXid in the WAL
> record, we could make that less conservative.

I think I can improve on the way we do this somewhat.

When we GetConflictingVirtualXIDs() with InvalidTransactionId we include
all backends.

If a query can only see currently-running xacts then it cannot see any
data that is being cleaned up because its xmin > latestCompletedXid.

Put another way, Assert(latestRemovedXid <= latestCompletedXid)

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com