Horton

Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION

Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Daniel Farina <drfarina@gmail.com>
Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Daniel Farina <dfarina@truviso.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-30T03:01:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 18:53 -0800, Daniel Farina wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> > What if the network buffer is flushed in the middle of a line? Is that
> > possible, or is there a guard against that somewhere?
> 
> What do you mean?  They both catenate onto one stream of bytes, it
> shouldn't matter where the flush boundaries are...

Nevermind, for some reason I thought you were talking about interleaving
the data rather than concatenating.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis