Re: [HACKERS] Updating column on row update
Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>, Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com>, PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-24T08:47:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 18:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> writes: > > I do think this comes up often enough that a built-in trigger "update > > named column with result of expression on insert" trigger might be > > desirable. > > There's something of the sort in contrib already, I believe, though > it's so old it still uses abstime :-( What's wrong with abstime ? it is valid for timestamps up to 2038-01-19 and it's on-disk size smaller than other timestamp options -- Hannu Krosing http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Scalability and Availability Services, Consulting and Training