Re: [HACKERS] Updating column on row update

Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>, Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com>, PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-24T08:47:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 18:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> writes:
> > I do think this comes up often enough that a built-in trigger "update
> > named column with result of expression on insert" trigger might be
> > desirable.
> 
> There's something of the sort in contrib already, I believe, though
> it's so old it still uses abstime :-(

What's wrong with abstime ?

it is valid for timestamps up to 2038-01-19 and it's on-disk size
smaller than other timestamp options


-- 
Hannu Krosing   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Scalability and Availability 
   Services, Consulting and Training