Horton

Re: Partitioning option for COPY

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu@asterdata.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel.Cecchet@asterdata.com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-11-23T15:26:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 09:39 -0500, Emmanuel Cecchet wrote:

> I think you should read the thread and the patch 

I did read the thread and patch in full before posting. My opinions are
given to help you and the community towards a desirable common goal.

I was unaware you were developing these ideas and so was unable to
provide comments until now. My review of Kedar's patch in July did lay
out in general terms a specific implementation route for future work on
partitioning. I had thought I might not have made those comments clearly
enough, so gave a more specific description of what I consider to be a
more workable and general solution for cacheing and using partitioning
metadata.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com