Re: Hot standby, race condition between recovery snapshot and commit

On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 21:37 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> Am I missing anything?

Will review.

> I also experimented with including the running-xacts information in the
> checkpoint record itself. That somehow feels more straightforward to me,
> but it wasn't really any less code, and it wouldn't allow us to do the
> running-xacts snapshot as multiple WAL records, so the current approach
> with separate running-xacts record is better.

Agreed, more modular.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com