Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-15T19:29:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 20:37 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > But a
> > query getting canceled because it touches a lot of tables sounds more
> > like a limitation than an outright bug, 
> 
> It's not that the query might get canceled. It will abort WAL recovery,
> kill all backends, and bring the whole standby down.

Hmm, I think the incredible exploding Hot Standby is overstating this
somewhat. We can improve the error handling for this rare case for which
a simple workaround exists, but it seems like we should punt to phase 2.

You agree there should be two phases?

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com