Horton
Menu

Re: operator exclusion constraints

Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>

View thread
From: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-07T19:43:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 14:11 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Honestly, I'd probably be in favor of breaking the virtual tie in
> favor of whichever word is already a keyword

The ones that are already keywords are EXCLUSIVE and EXCLUDING, which
are also the least desirable, so that rule doesn't work as a
tie-breaker.

I think that EXCLUSION and EXCLUDE are the options still in the running
here.

Regards,
	Jeff Davis