Re: operator exclusion constraints

On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 22:42 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> The current patch writes the syntax like this
>   EXCLUSION USING gist (c CHECK WITH &&)
> makes it look like a table constraint, yet it clearly refers to a
> single
> column. That looks very clumsy to read, to my eyes.

I think the word CHECK should be avoided completely in this syntax, to
avoid confusion with CHECK constraints.