Re: Atomic operations within spinlocks
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-06-04T18:50:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote: > I think a good case could be made for ripping out what's there now > and just redefining nextVictimBuffer as a pg_atomic_uint64 that we > never reset (ie, make its comment actually true). Then ClockSweepTick > reduces to > pg_atomic_fetch_add_u64(&StrategyControl->nextVictimBuffer, 1) % NBuffers > and when we want to know how many cycles have been completed, we just > divide the counter by NBuffers. Actually ... we could probably use this design with a uint32 counter as well, on machines where the 64-bit operations would be slow. In that case, integer overflow of nextVictimBuffer would happen from time to time, resulting in 1. The next actual victim buffer index would jump strangely. This doesn't seem like it'd matter at all, as long as it was infrequent. 2. The computed completePasses value would go backwards. I bet that wouldn't matter too much either, or at least we could teach BgBufferSync to cope. (I notice the comments therein suggest that it is already designed to cope with completePasses wrapping around, so maybe nothing needs to be done.) If NBuffers was large enough to be a significant fraction of UINT_MAX, then these corner cases would happen often enough to perhaps be problematic. But I seriously doubt that'd be possible on hardware that wasn't capable of using the 64-bit code path. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Convert SpinLock* macros to static inline functions.
- bfc321b4723e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Clean up includes of s_lock.h.
- f219167910ad 14.0 landed
-
Fix deadlock danger when atomic ops are done under spinlock.
- 5fffa8fce37b 13.0 landed
- 6cc2866c4cdf 12.4 landed
- 825d89dda5ad 11.9 landed
- c2a84bee1228 10.14 landed
- 8bc13287ed3e 9.6.19 landed
- 3e69bf3b142b 9.5.23 landed
- cf1234a10e50 14.0 landed
-
Add basic spinlock tests to regression tests.
- 3f66e1c5a576 10.14 landed
- e027219f2131 11.9 landed
- 008c119928a3 12.4 landed
- 59225dcefef2 13.0 landed
- 3b37a6de027c 14.0 landed
- e8302f107af9 9.6.19 landed
- 7e91f90a8ed4 9.5.23 landed
-
spinlock emulation: Fix bug when more than INT_MAX spinlocks are initialized.
- dcf3cb60cbef 9.5.23 landed
- 660622053419 9.6.19 landed
- b295f666b7f0 10.14 landed
- 34d29222a0bb 11.9 landed
- b91cfaa34f44 12.4 landed
- 276bdc93924a 13.0 landed
- 4d4ca24efe8e 14.0 landed
-
Avoid potential spinlock in a signal handler as part of global barriers.
- 09bff91b316e 13.0 landed
- fd49d5380757 14.0 landed
-
Make pg_stat_wal_receiver consistent with the WAL receiver's shmem info
- 2c8dd05d6cbc 13.0 cited
-
Improve 64bit atomics support.
- e8fdbd58fe56 10.0 cited