Re: Rejecting weak passwords

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, mlortiz <mlortiz@uci.cu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-10-14T22:25:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 18:38 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> So throwing out a wild idea that's probably just wild enough to even
> consider, but one way to deal with the logging side of things would be
> to deprecate/remove ALTER USER/CREATE USER with password, and add a
> separate API call. With a separate wire protocol packet. That would
> certainly take care of the logging part ;)

I think that would be the correct fix.