Re: BUG #18184: ERROR: wrong varnullingrels (b) (expected (b 3)) for Var 2/2
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Cc: marian.krucina@linuxbox.cz, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-11-09T20:51:01Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 10:39 PM PG Bug reporting form < > noreply@postgresql.org> wrote: >> ERROR: wrong varnullingrels (b) (expected (b 3)) for Var 2/2 > It seems that when we optimize field selection from a whole-row Var into > a simple Var while simplifying functions, we fail to propagate the > nullingrels into the new Var. Yup, good catch! Fix pushed with a little editorializing on the test case (mainly to try to ensure cross-platform stability of its plan). > Attached is a hotfix for this error. But I'm wondering if there are > other similar cases where we have mismatched nullingrels that we haven't > discovered yet. Any thoughts? It's worrisome I agree. I looked through the other calls of makeVar() and didn't find any that seemed wrong. (There are a lot of them that are concerned with cases like manufacturing rowmark Vars, which I think are OK because we don't support FOR UPDATE on nullable rels.) Still, I wouldn't be totally surprised if we find a few more. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Fix computation of varnullingrels when const-folding field selection.
- 6bf2efb38285 16.2 landed
- 36f5594c0fe6 17.0 landed