Horton

Re: Meson far from ready on Windows

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

View thread
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-06-23T10:18:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. meson: Add dependency lookups via names used by cmake

  2. meson: Add support for detecting gss without pkg-config

  3. meson: Add support for detecting ossp-uuid without pkg-config

On 2024-06-21 Fr 11:15 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> As a practical matter, I don't think MSVC is coming back. The
> buildfarm was already changed over to use meson, and it would be
> pretty disruptive to try to re-add buildfarm coverage for a
> resurrected MSVC on the eve of beta2. I think we should focus on
> improving whatever isn't quite right in meson -- plenty of other
> people have also complained about various things there, me included --
> rather than trying to undo over a year's worth of work by lots of
> people to get things on Windows switched over to MSVC.
>

As a practical matter, whether the buildfarm client uses meson or not is 
a matter of one line in the client's config file. Support for the old 
system is still there, of course, as it's required on older branches. So 
the impact would be pretty minimal if we did decide to re-enable the old 
build system. There are only two MSVC animals building master right now: 
drongo (run by me) and hammerkop (run by our friends at SRA OSS).

I am not necessarily advocating it, just setting the record straight 
about how  easy it would be to switch the buildfarm.


cheers


andrew




--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com