AW: update on TOAST status'

> > I don't like that --- seems it would put a definite crimp in the
> > whole point of TOAST, which is not to have arbitrary limits on field
> > sizes.
> 
>     If we can solve it, let's do so. If we cannot, let's restrict
>     it for 7.1.

How are you doing the index toasting currently ? Is it on the same 
line as table toasting ? That is: toast some index column values if the key 
exceeds 2k ?

Andreas