Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>, Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-12-26T12:03:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 10:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> An ALTER TABLE SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED switch might have some merit, but
> please don't muddy the waters by confusing this with temp-table
> status.

I would not be against such a table-level switch, but the exact
behaviour would need to be specified more closely before this became a
TODO item, IMHO.

If someone has a 100 GB table, they would not appreciate the table being
truncated if a transaction to load 1 GB of data aborts, forcing recovery
of the 100 GB table.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs