Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1

On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 16:12 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, L, 2005-12-03 kell 09:21, kirjutas Simon Riggs:
> 
> > First off, I think we need to do some more work on partitioning so that
> > some knowledge about the union set is understood by the optimizer. At
> > the moment there is no concept of partition key, so its hard to spot
> > when two union sets have the same key to allow pushdown.
> 
> One of the easier cases would be non-overlapping (exclusive) constraints
> on union subtables on the joined column.
> 
> This could serve as a "partition key", or in case of many nonoverlapping
> columns (ex.: table is partitioned by date and region), as many
> partition keys.

Yes, thats my planned direction.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs