Re: NOLOGGING option, or ?
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
From: Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@surnet.cl>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-06-01T22:37:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On K, 2005-06-01 at 18:05 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > What we could do is to do no-WAL automatically for empty tables (like > when a database is first loaded), You forget that some databases use WAL for PITR / replication and doing it automatically there would surely mess up their replica. How is index creation handeled if it is not logged in WAL ? - is it not automatically WAL'ed ? - Must one recreate indexes after PITR or failover ? > and use the flag for cases where the > tables is not zero pages. The fact is that database loads are a prefect > case for this optimization and old dumps are not going to have that flag > anyway, and automatic is better if we can do it. -- Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>