Re: ARC patent
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2005-01-18T23:48:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 18:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I have already > suggested to core that we should insist on 8.1 not requiring an initdb, > so as to ensure that people will migrate up to it easily from 8.0. So is it firm policy that changes that require a catversion update cannot be made during the 8.1 cycle? (Needless to say, it would be good to get this sorted out early on in the 8.1 development cycle, to avoid the need to revert patches at some point down the line. For those of us working on large projects that will definitely require an initdb, it would also be good to know -- as this policy will likely prevent that work from getting into 8.1) -Neil