Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2005-08-15T18:24:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > I have negotiated with the author of pl/Ruby to release plRuby under the > PostgreSQL license. The reason I did this is the following: > 1. I felt we needed a truly OO language in core. > 2. plPython isn't really moving forward and has the whole > trusted/untrusted issue. Hmm. I read this as Problem: not enough hackers to maintain our PL languages. Proposed solution: add more PL languages. Somehow this doesn't seem quite right. If pl/ruby is going to get into the core, it should be because of demand for it based on its own merits. I don't think this has got anything to do with pl/python. regards, tom lane