Re: git: uh-oh

Max Bowsher <maxb@f2s.com> writes:
> Personally, the idea of trying to use git-filter-branch to make what
> cvs2git currently gives you more sensible scares me silly.

I'm not excited about it either --- but if Magnus wants to experiment,
no harm trying.

> Another glitch that might be worth fixing before you convert is the way
> that cvs2git says "This commit was manufactured by cvs2svn to create
> branch", when it actually means "manufactured to incrementally create
> the branch state as it appears in CVS" - i.e. many of these commits
> actually update an existing branch. Just as soon as I can figure out how
> to cleanly fit that into cvs2git's structure, I want it to change the
> word "create" to "update" in most of those commits.

I thought all of those message texts were taken from the configuration
file.

			regards, tom lane