Re: query_id: jumble names of temp tables for better pg_stat_statement UX

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, ma lz <ma100@hotmail.com>
Date: 2025-03-25T02:56:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com> writes:
> I agree that some may want stats to merge for the same tables,
> and others may not. I will suggest this with some hesitation, but why not
> make this behavior configurable via a GUC?
> We recently introduced query_id_squash_values for controlling
> the merge of an IN list, maybe this is another queryId behavior we should
> provide a configuration for?

I don't like that GUC and I would not like this one either.  We
learned years ago that GUCs that change query semantics are a bad
idea, but apparently now we have hackers who need to relearn that
lesson the hard way.  (Admittedly, this isn't quite *query* semantics,
which perhaps lessens the blast radius.  But I think we're still going
to regret query_id_squash_values.)

			regards, tom lane



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Use relation name instead of OID in query jumbling for RangeTblEntry

  2. Fix two issues with custom_query_jumble in gen_node_support.pl

  3. pg_stat_statements: Add more tests with temp tables and namespaces

  4. Add support for custom_query_jumble as a node field attribute