Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>,
brian.williams@mayalane.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-11-08T16:41:59Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2019-Nov-08, Tom Lane wrote: >> So the patch becomes s/virgin/pristine/g plus add a parenthetical >> definition for the first use? Works for me. > Well, there are three uses of the word "virgin". The first is for > "virgin user", and the patch turns that into just "user". Uh, no, read the next lines. In both cases those are referring to "virgin user database" or "virgin database", and this patch is removing an important qualifier. It needs to be s/virgin/pristine/ in all these places. Since the third case is well separated from the other two, maybe we need to repeat the parenthetical definition there too. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Remove the word "virgins" for documentation
- 6ae4d271879b 13.0 landed