Re: List of Bitmapset (was Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions)
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>,
Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-11-15T18:25:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 11:57 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> + * The new member is identified by the zero-based index of the List >> + * element it should go into, and the bit number to be set therein. > The comment sounds a bit ambiguous, especially the ", and the bit > number to be set therein." part. If you meant to describe the > arguments, how about mentioning their names too, as in: Done that way in the patch I just posted. >> + /* forboth will stop at the end of the shorter list, which is fine */ > Isn't this comment unnecessary given that the while loop makes both > lists be the same length? No, the while loop ensures that a is at least as long as b. It could have started out longer, though. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Invent "multibitmapsets", and use them to speed up antijoin detection.
- e9e26b5e7166 16.0 landed