Re: vacuum_truncate configuration parameter and isset_offset
Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>
From: Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>
To: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>,
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>, Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>,
Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>, Will Storey <will@summercat.com>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2025-03-24T16:06:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
В письме от понедельник, 24 марта 2025 г. 19:00:51 MSK пользователь Álvaro Herrera написал: > I don't understand why this shouldn't work exactly like > vacuum_index_cleanup (cf. vacuum_rel lines 2170ff). That would require > no new mechanism. In my opinion it should. "no new mechanism" is good. "new mechanism" is bad. :-) -- Nikolay Shaplov aka Nataraj Fuzzing Engineer at Postgres Professional Matrix IM: @dhyan:nataraj.su