Re: bug in index?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Martin, Sylvain R. (LNG)" <Sylvain.Martin@lexis-nexis.com>
Cc: "'pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org'" <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-07-07T19:37:14Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
I had your prior message on my "to look at" list; the behavior seems
pretty odd.  Two questions:

  1.  Which version are you running, exactly?

  2.  Might 'peripherals & access' happen to be the largest (last in
      sort order) keyword present in your table?

If #2 is true, then this might represent some sort of boundary-condition
misbehavior in the cost estimator.  But I don't see anything like it
happening in current sources.

			regards, tom lane