Horton

Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>, Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-01-18T16:44:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> No, I don't think so. Has any evidence been submitted that that part of
>> the patch is of benefit?

> I think you might be mixing up what's actually in the patch with
> another idea that was proposed but isn't actually in the patch.  The
> patch itself does nothing controversial.

Oh, I misread Itagaki-san's comment to imply that that *was* in the
patch.  Maybe I should go read it.

			regards, tom lane