Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-20T14:21:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com> writes: > While table 9.5 with functions looks quite nice, I quite dislike 9.4 with > operators. > Previously, I could lookup operator in the leftmost column and read on. > Right now I have to look through the whole table (well, not really, but > still) to find the operator. Aside from the alternatives already discussed, the only other idea that's come to my mind is to write operator entries in a style like || as in: text || text → text Concatenates the two strings. 'Post' || 'greSQL' → PostgreSQL Not sure that that's any better, but it is another alternative. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.
- 4ad047a6eac3 13.0 landed
-
Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.
- 737d69ffc3cf 13.0 landed