Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>, mhh@mindspring.com, Jan Wieck <janwieck@Yahoo.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-11-10T16:39:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > When we implement schemas, then all objects belonging to the > DEFINITION_SCHEMA will not be dumped, all other objects will be. At least > I imagine that this might be something to work with. That's a thought, although it still doesn't cope with the issue of "what if I've altered a standard system object?" ... which is what I think Mark was getting at yesterday. I'm not sure there's any reasonable way to handle that, though, short of diff'ing against a dump of template1 :-( To bring this back from future nice solutions to the reality of what to do today, do people like the "template0" solution for now (7.1)? I can work on it if so. regards, tom lane