Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-24T16:02:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes: > On 2011-02-24 5:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Oh, did we decide to do it that way? OK with me, but the submitted docs >> are woefully inadequate on the point. This behavior is going to have to >> be explained extremely clearly (and even so, I bet we'll get bug reports >> about it :-(). > I'm ready to put more effort into the documentation if the patch is > going in, but I really don't want to waste my time just to hear that the > patch is not going to be in 9.1. Does this sound acceptable? I've found some things I don't like about it, but the only part that seems far short of being committable is the documentation. regards, tom lane