Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg@sympatico.ca>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-24T16:02:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
> On 2011-02-24 5:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh, did we decide to do it that way?  OK with me, but the submitted docs
>> are woefully inadequate on the point.  This behavior is going to have to
>> be explained extremely clearly (and even so, I bet we'll get bug reports
>> about it :-().

> I'm ready to put more effort into the documentation if the patch is 
> going in, but I really don't want to waste my time just to hear that the 
> patch is not going to be in 9.1.  Does this sound acceptable?

I've found some things I don't like about it, but the only part that
seems far short of being committable is the documentation.

			regards, tom lane