Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Date: 2010-10-28T13:49:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Actually, I wonder if we could just have a separate canon_pathkeys list > for each EquivalenceClass, instead of one big list in PlannerInfo. I'm > not too familiar with equivalence classes and all that, Hm. I don't like getting rid of the main canon_pathkeys list like that. The whole point of a canonical pathkey is that there is only one, so it seems like we need a central list. But it might be sane for each EC to have an additional, side list of PKs made from it. regards, tom lane