Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objects?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov
Cc: "'pgsql-general '" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>, "'pgsql-hackers '" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-11-27T19:07:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Michael Ansley <Michael.Ansley@intec-telecom-systems.com> writes:
>>>> Remember also that the GiST library has been integrated into PG, (my brother
>>>> is doing some thesis workon that at the moment),
>> 
>> Yeah?  Does it still work?

> You bet. One would otherwise be hearing from me. I depend on it quite
> heavily and I am checking with almost every release.

That's very good to hear!  I was not aware that anyone was banging on it.

It seems like it would be a fine idea to adopt your stuff at least into
the contrib part of the distribution, maybe even (or eventually) into
the main release.  I think we could probably make it part of the regress
tests even if it's contrib --- there's precedent, as regress already
uses some contrib stuff.

Do you have any problem with releasing your stuff under the Postgres
distribution terms (BSD license)?

			regards, tom lane