Re: [HACKERS] Indexing for geographic objects?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov
Cc: "'pgsql-general '" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>, "'pgsql-hackers '" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-11-27T19:07:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
selkovjr@mcs.anl.gov writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Michael Ansley <Michael.Ansley@intec-telecom-systems.com> writes: >>>> Remember also that the GiST library has been integrated into PG, (my brother >>>> is doing some thesis workon that at the moment), >> >> Yeah? Does it still work? > You bet. One would otherwise be hearing from me. I depend on it quite > heavily and I am checking with almost every release. That's very good to hear! I was not aware that anyone was banging on it. It seems like it would be a fine idea to adopt your stuff at least into the contrib part of the distribution, maybe even (or eventually) into the main release. I think we could probably make it part of the regress tests even if it's contrib --- there's precedent, as regress already uses some contrib stuff. Do you have any problem with releasing your stuff under the Postgres distribution terms (BSD license)? regards, tom lane