Re: partition -> partitioned
Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-06-19T08:51:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2018/05/17 11:48, Amit Langote wrote: > On 2018/05/17 11:40, David Rowley wrote: >> On 17 May 2018 at 13:52, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> Commit 499be013de6 used 'partition' where it really meant 'partitioned' in >>> a few places including in a variable name. For example, what almost all >>> places call 'partitioned_rels', make_partition_pruneinfo called >>> 'partition_rels'. >>> >>> Attached a patch to make that uniform to avoid confusion. >> >> Looks good to me. > > Thanks for taking a look at it. Did this perhaps get forgotten? Thanks, Amit
Commits
-
Consistently use the term 'partitioned rel' in partprune comments
- 8f97af60d19a 11.0 landed
-
Support partition pruning at execution time
- 499be013de65 11.0 cited