Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> 'Extension Template' is fine, I was just objecting to places in the code
> where it just says 'TEMPLATE'.  I imagine we might have some 'XXX
> Template' at some point in the future and then we'd have confusion
> between "is this an *extension* template or an XXX template?".

We already do: see text search templates.  The code tends to call those
TSTEMPLATEs, so I'd suggest ACL_KIND_EXTTEMPLATE or some such.  I agree
with Stephen's objection to use of the bare word "template".

			regards, tom lane