Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2)

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, "Tille, Andreas" <TilleA@rki.de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-11-22T16:25:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee> writes:
> But
> http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?sql-syntax-columns.html

That documentation is in error (my fault).  Current docs say

xmax

     The identity (transaction ID) of the deleting transaction, or zero
     for an undeleted tuple. It is possible for this field to 
     be nonzero in a visible tuple: that usually indicates that the
     deleting transaction hasn't committed yet, or that an 
     attempted deletion was rolled back. 

> I also think that this kas historically been the behaviour 

No, it wasn't.

			regards, tom lane