Horton

Re: Error code for "terminating connection due to conflict with recovery"

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, fgp@phlo.org, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-02-01T00:25:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I agree, 28 is a completely off-point category. But it wasn't in 40
>> before, either --- we are talking about where it currently says
>> ADMIN_SHUTDOWN, no? I'd vote for keeping it in class 57 (operator
>> intervention), as that is both sensible and a minimal change from
>> current behavior.

> Seems a little weird to me, since the administrator hasn't done
> anything.

Sure he has: he issued the DROP DATABASE command that's causing the
system to disconnect standby sessions.

			regards, tom lane