Re: proposal: separate databases for contrib module testing

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-12-02T15:05:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I'd like to change the way we set the CONTRIB_TESTDB name for contrib 
> modules. so that each module doesn't wipe out the previous module's test 
> db.

Personally I always thought that was a feature not a bug.  If we give
each one its own DB, there will be a couple of dozen databases
cluttering the installation at the end of "make installcheck", and no
convenient way to get rid of them.  Moreover, what I think you've got
in mind doesn't work in the "make check" case anyway --- you'd have
little alternative but to test upgrading each one separately.

			regards, tom lane