Re: Big 7.4 items
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
From: Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, kward@peerdirect.com, patrickm@redhat.com, darren@up.hrcoxmail.com, Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>, jrnield@usol.com
Date: 2002-12-14T04:50:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 20:20, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > This is a good point. I don't want to push Postgres-R as our solution. > > Rather, I have looked at both and like Postgres-R, but others need to > > look at both and decide so we are all in agreement when we move forward. > > I think in either way, it's clear that they need to be in the main CVS, in > order for it to get up to speed. Why's that? Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC