Re: Dirty Buffer Writing [was Proposed LogWriter Scheme]
Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net>
From: Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Curtis Faith <curtis@galtair.com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Pgsql-Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-10-08T14:55:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce, Is there remarks along these lines in the performance turning section of the docs? Based on what's coming out of this it would seem that stressing the importance of leaving a notable (rule of thumb here?) amount for general OS/kernel needs is pretty important. Greg On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 09:50, Tom Lane wrote: > (This is, BTW, one of the reasons for discouraging people from pushing > Postgres' shared buffer cache up to a large fraction of total RAM; > starving the kernel of disk buffers is just plain not a good idea.)