Horton

Re: Memory leak from ExecutorState context?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-05-19T15:28:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> I didn't push 0001, I don't think generally do separate pgindent patches
> like this (I only run pgindent on large patches to ensure it doesn't
> cause massive breakage, not separately like this, but YMMV).

It's especially pointless when the main pgindent run for v16 is going
to happen today (as soon as I get done clearing out my other queue
items).

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Describe hash join implementation