Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE

Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net>

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net>
To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Louis-David Mitterrand <vindex@apartia.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2002-04-17T06:36:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 11:00, mlw wrote:
>
> Here is the problem, in a single paragraph.
> 
> If the DBA notices that there is a problem with a query, he adds an index, he
> notices that there is no difference, then he notices that PostgreSQL is not
> using his index. First and foremost he gets mad at PostgreSQL for not using his
> index.

Perhaps a notice from backend:

NOTICE: I see the DBA has created a useless index ...

;) 

Or would this make the DBA even madder ;) ;)

> If PostgreSQL decided to use an index which increases execution time,
> the DBA would delete the index. If PostgreSQL does not use an index, he has to
> modify the posgresql.conf file,

Or just do

set enable_seqscan to off;

> which disallows PostgreSQL from using an index when it would be a clear loser.
> 
> My assertion is this: "If a DBA creates an index, he has a basis for his
> actions."

The basis can be that "his boss told him to" ?

------------------
Hannu