Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>,
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-03-23T20:55:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info> writes: > Have we even reached a consensus yet on that doing it the way, my patch > is proposing, is the right way to go? Like that emitting BLOB TOC > entries into SECTION_DATA when in binary upgrade mode is a good thing? > Or that bunching all the SQL statements for creating the blob, changing > the ACL and COMMENT and SECLABEL all in one multi-statement-query is. Now you're asking for actual review effort, which is a little hard to come by towards the tail end of the last CF of a cycle. I'm interested in this topic, but I can't justify spending much time on it right now. regards, tom lane
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Count individual SQL commands in pg_restore's --transaction-size mode.
- 81db073a2878 17.0 landed
- 0f1290521504 18.0 landed
-
Reduce number of commands dumpTableSchema emits for binary upgrade.
- b3f0e0503f33 18.0 landed
- 2fa989e6a340 17.0 landed
-
Invent --transaction-size option for pg_restore.
- 959b38d770ba 17.0 landed
-
Rearrange pg_dump's handling of large objects for better efficiency.
- a45c78e3284b 17.0 landed
-
Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints
- 46a0cd4cefb4 17.0 cited
-
Fix typo and case in messages
- 7d7ef075d2b3 17.0 cited