Re: logical changeset generation v4

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-01-18T17:37:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I took a quick look at this and am just curious why we're adding the
> requirement that t_tableOid has to be initialized?

I assume he meant it had been left at a random value, which is surely
bad practice even if a specific usage doesn't fall over today.

			regards, tom lane