Re: wCTE behaviour

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>

Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>

Date: 2010-12-22T20:54:08Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi> writes:
> On 2010-12-22 8:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Is this the patch of record?  There are no changes to the documentation
>> included.

> I've kept the documentation as a separate patch, but I haven't touched 
> it in a very long time.  I will work on the documentation if there's a 
> chance of the patch getting accepted for 9.1.  This arrangement makes 
> more sense to me and I'm sure others will agree.

Well, it's difficult to review a documentation-free patch.

			regards, tom lane