Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-12-08T22:42:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > Tom, it's been about 3.5 months since you wrote this. I think it > would be really valuable if you could get to this RSN because the > large patch set posted on the "Changed SRF in targetlist handling" > thread is backed up behind this -- and I think that's really valuable > work which I don't want to see slip out of this release. Yeah, I was busy with other stuff during the recent commitfest. I'll try to get back to this. There's still only 24 hours in a day, though. (And no, [1] is not enough to help.) regards, tom lane [1] https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/dec/07/earths-day-lengthens-by-two-milliseconds-a-century-astronomers-find
Commits
-
Remove obsoleted code relating to targetlist SRF evaluation.
- ea15e18677fc 10.0 landed
-
Doc: improve documentation of new SRF-in-tlist behavior.
- f13a1277aa2d 10.0 landed
-
Move targetlist SRF handling from expression evaluation to new executor node.
- 69f4b9c85f16 10.0 landed
-
Don't split up SRFs when choosing to postpone SELECT output expressions.
- d543170f2fdd 9.6.0 cited