Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-02-07T08:01:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > What about > 3) Use reltoastidxid if != InvalidOid and manually build the list (using > RelationGetIndexList) otherwise? Do we actually need reltoastidxid at all? I always thought having that field was a case of premature optimization. There might be some case for keeping it to avoid breaking any client-side code that might be looking at it ... but if you're proposing changing the field contents anyway, that argument goes right out the window. regards, tom lane
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Background worker processes
- da07a1e85651 9.3.0 cited
-
Fix assorted bugs in CREATE/DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
- 3c84046490be 9.3.0 cited
-
Work around unportable behavior of malloc(0) and realloc(NULL, 0).
- 09ac603c36d1 9.3.0 cited
-
Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.
- beb850e1d873 9.3.0 cited