Re: I can't upgrade to PostgreSQL 7.4 in RedHat 9.0
Stephen Robert Norris <srn@commsecure.com.au>
From: Stephen Robert Norris <srn@commsecure.com.au>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
Cc: Manuel Tejada <mantemu@terra.com.pe>, Ericson Smith <eric@did-it.com>, Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-02-02T11:42:42Z
Lists: pgsql-general
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 22:11, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 04:22:29PM +1100, Stephen Robert Norris wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 13:04, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 08:50:47PM -0500, Manuel Tejada wrote: > > > > > > > By the way, what does mean RHEL3? > > > > > > "Red Hat Entreprise Linux", a commercial Linux distribution (meaning you > > > shouldn't use it unless you pay for it). > > > > No, it means you won't get support unless you pay for it, and if you get > > support for a single machine in your organisation using RHEL, you must > > get support for all of them. > > It's exactly the same thing. Using an unsupported operating system is > only a matter of time before some cracker 0wnz j00. Of course, you > could build your own security updates, but it will be a very expensive > thing to do. In this situation one should really consider switching to > another distribution, like, say, White Box (which is built from the > SRPMs of RHEL), or any other of the big ones. Or go with some *BSD. Huh? Or just use Fedora Core, which is what the consumer grade RedHat distro has become... -- Stephen Norris srn@fn.com.au Farrow Norris Pty Ltd +61 417 243 239