Horton

Re: [HACKERS] Autocomplete <TAB> on Postgres7.4beta5 not

Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera Munoz <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>, Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>, pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Ian Barwick <barwick@gmx.net>
Date: 2003-10-29T03:22:14Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 19:34, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> writes:
> > > Is it possible to remove the implicit search path of pg_catalog from a 
> > > psql session without it breaking lots of stuff?
> > 
> > Do you consider "+", "count()", etc to be important stuff?
> 
> Me, hardly ever use them  :-)  So I can assume that removing the implicit 
> pg_catalog from the search path is a "bad thing."

From the search_path certainly -- but we can we teach the difference
between implicit and explicit to the *is_visible functions?